SuperDuperSecretary / Technical conversations

Big conversations. Little overhead.

An engineering-preview workspace for disclosed, consented technical calls and practice sessions that brings approved source evidence, optional captions, and reviewed talking points together.

Current statusEngineering preview
Abstract audio waveform passing through source cards and evidence nodes into a reviewed response
Illustrative product visualNo customer or workspace data.
01 / Intended use

Built around a real workflow.

Technical consultants, founders, and product specialists preparing for and participating in permitted customer conversations.

The existing source foundation includes bounded source search, manual notes, optional transcription paths, reviewed drafts, and a separate presentation view. It is an engineering preview, not a public signup or general-availability claim.

02 / Capabilities

What the current foundation supports.

01

Approved source search

Search a user-selected text or code folder and inspect file- and line-backed excerpts before using them.

02

Selected capture

Take manual notes and optionally transcribe an explicitly selected audio source through a configured local speech path.

03

Grounded drafts

Prepare proposed responses from approved context with citations and uncertainty kept visible for review.

04

Reviewed stage

Move only approved notes and titles into a separate presentation view controlled by the user.

05

Optional call room

Use a separate guest environment for supported meeting links while the meeting provider remains responsible for the call.

03 / Boundaries

Clear about what is not claimed.

  • For disclosed, consented business meetings, demos, and practice—not covert assistance or assessment bypass.
  • No claim of universal platform support, production accessibility, or proven live-meeting performance.
  • Generated transcripts and suggested responses can be wrong and require human review.
04 / Next step

Define the conversation and the evidence that belongs in it.

Start with the workflow, the inputs, the reviewer, and the result that would be useful.